Home » Kodak » Kodak Sport Disposible Camera, 27 Exposure, Waterproof up to 50 feet

Kodak Sport Disposible Camera, 27 Exposure, Waterproof up to 50 feet

Kodak Sport Disposible Camera, 27 Exposure, Waterproof up to 50 feet

August 26th, 2011
Kodak
Customer Reviews : 3 Reviews
View : 23
Reg. Price :$ 22.99
Price :$ 3.30
You save: $ 19 (86%)
Tags : bright vibrant colors, Camera, Disposible, exposure, feet, Kodak, kodak max, picture, Plus, shock proof, Sport, Waterproof

Descriptions

A One-Time-Use camera made to survive where a regular camera won’t! Made with a rugged, durable and shock-proof frame; waterproof down to 50 ft. (15 m); scratch-resistant lens, this disposable camera can be used in virtually any outdoor land or water situation. Kodak MAX Versatility Plus Film brings picture quality to a new level by combining the color quality, fine detail, and picture clarity of lower-speed films with the benefits of higher speed films. This film delivers extra sharpness and unsurpassed fine grain (among 800-speed films) for crisper, clearer pictures, even when enlarged. Kodak MAX Versatility Plus Film produces consistently bright, vibrant colors across a wide range of lighting conditions. It provides accurate skin-tone reproduction for natural-looking “people pictures.”

Details

  • Divers and snorklers, capture the vibrancy of life 50 feet underwater.
  • No blurry pictures from sunscreen smudges; Avoid scratches from sand and snow that can ruin pictures.
  • Rugged, durable, shock-proof rubber shell.
  • Great for bumpy rides and rocky trails.
  • Stocked with Kodak MAX Versatility Plus 800 Film

  1. Hey Mo!! // August 26th, 2011 at 1:06 pm
    127 of 128 people found the following review helpful:
    3.0 out of 5 stars
    Go for the Fuji, January 29, 2005
    By 
    Hey Mo!! (The City of Townsville) –
    (VINE VOICE)
      

    Amazon Verified Purchase(What’s this?)

    I tried several cameras on a recent dive trip, including a Kodak and a Fuji disposable waterproof camera.

    Neither camera has a flash, which means that everything will come out in shades of blue under water unless you bring your own light.

    Neither camera leaked, which gave them an edge over more expensive “professional” cameras on this trip.

    Both the Kodak and Fuji look very similar with a sealed plastic case (with slight positive buoyancy) and thick rubberbands for securing to a wrist or clipping to a BCD.

    I have to give the edge to the Fuji in terms of both design and results. The Fuji was easier to wind and to snap shots with and the pictures came out sharper. The 800 film in the Kodak produced shots that were way too grainy.

    Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes
    No

  2. R. Mufti // August 26th, 2011 at 1:33 pm
    47 of 48 people found the following review helpful:
    4.0 out of 5 stars
    No enough sunlight under 10m,,, no flash either :-( , July 25, 2003
    By 
    R. Mufti (Jeddah, JED Saudi Arabia) –
    (REAL NAME)
      

    This camera looks really good and promising. Although Kodak says it could down to 50ft, the camera itself has the phrase “max 35ft or 10m” written on it. But we reached 60ft and nothing happened to it. It didn’t break or leak! It also is a little bit buoyant, which means it won’t sink if dropped, instead it will ascend.

    It has two disadvantages; the first is its lack to a flash. There isn’t much sunlight under 35ft of sea water and so the photos turned out a little too dark and bluish. After color correction the photos turned so pale and spotted. The pictures taken above 20ft were awesome. The second disadvantage is that the camera’s eye lens it too small for someone who is wearing a diving mask (goggle).

    The camera doesn’t lose its color to the eye even under 60ft since it is blue. And it has a place where a rope or a nylon tape can be tied to it so it can be attached to the diving jacket (BCD).

    It is not perfect, but it’s the best.

    Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes
    No

  3. Anonymous // August 26th, 2011 at 1:49 pm
    42 of 43 people found the following review helpful:
    3.0 out of 5 stars
    No flash no big deal?, November 19, 2003
    By A Customer

    My wife and I bought this camera at the last minute to take with us to Hawaii for our honeymoon. We went snorkeling in Molikini (who hasn’t?) and I have to say 3 things about this camera that have been mentioned already but need to be taken into serious consideration.

    1. Price – A $10 waterproof disposable camera is very reasonable. I think for the price this camera is everything it is suppossed to be. The charter we went on the snorkeling trip with was renting $400 cameras with all the bells and whistles for $20 and $10 per roll of film.

    2. Flash – For a snorkeling trip, and staying close to the surface I have to say this camera didn’t do too bad. The colors were a bit blueish but nothing that I can’t live with. As far as my 25 foot dive down to a turtle to get a picture, I shouldn’t have wasted the picture, it is dark and blurry without a flash.

    3. Eye Piece – This is a big pain to use with goggles. I eventually stopped trying to aim and just started snapping pictures. I would have to say that to be able to take clear photos underwater this camera needs a bigger eye piece.

    Overall I was satisfied with this camera but to tell you the truth I wish I would have rented the camera from the boat with the flash (if only for the picture of me and a giant turtle).

    Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes
    No